摘要
摘要目的分析评估双耳突发性聋与单耳突发性聋的病理生理机制及临床治疗预后情况.方法选取我院２０１２年１月~２０１４年１月收治的１８４例突发性耳聋患者作为研究的对象,将其分为双耳耳聋组(７８例)和单耳耳聋组(１０６例),并对２组患者的病理生理机制及临床治疗预后情况进行对比分析.结果在２组患者合并高血脂、糖尿病的病例比较方面,双耳耳聋组的比例高于单耳耳聋组(P＜０．０５＝,相比于双耳耳聋组,单耳耳聋组的治疗效率更高(P＜０．０５).结论经我院研究得出,在发病的原因方面,双耳突发性聋与单耳突发性聋患者存在差异,这也致使二者对应的患者的病理生理机制及临床治疗预后不同,应当在临床中予以重视.关键词突发性耳聋;双耳;单耳;生理机制ThepathophysiologicalmechanismandclinicaltreatmentofthepatientswithsuddendeafnessandsuddendeafnessAbstractObjectiveToevaluatethepathophysiologicalmechanismandclinicaltreatmentofthepatientswithsuddendeafnessandsingleearhearingloss．Methods２０１２JanuaryinJanuaryof１８４casesofsuddendeafnesspatientsastheresearchobject,thepointsfordeafgroup(７８cases)andmonauraldeafnessgroup(１０６cases),andpathophysiologyof２groupsofpatientsandclinicalprognosisofscoreanalysis．ResultsintwogroupsofpatientswithhyperlipemiaanddiＧabeteswerecompared,thedeafgroupratiohigherthanmonauraldeafnessgroup(P＜０．０５)．Comparedtothedeafgroup,monauraldeafnessgrouptreatmentefＧficiencyhigher(P＜０．０５)．Conclusionaccordingtotheresults,inthecauseofthedisease,doubletofsuddendeafnessandsingleearsuddendeafnesspatientsdifferences,whichalsoresultedinpathophysiologyoftwocorrespondingtothepatientsandclinicalprognosisofdifferent,shouldbepaidmoreattentioninclinic．KeywordsSuddendeafness;Ears;Singleear;Physiologicalmechanism中图分类号R７６４文献标识码B文章编号１００１－５３０２(２０１５)０９－０７６４－０２
出版日期
2015年09月19日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）
