护理干预在131I治疗甲状腺功能亢进症中的效果观察

在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
摘要 中图分类号R581.1文献标识码B文章编号1672-3783(2015)07-0015-01摘要目的探讨护理干预在131I治疗甲状腺功能亢进症中的效果。方法选取本院在2014年2月~2014年12月收治的100例甲亢患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组50例,对两组患者均采用131I进行治疗,在治疗期间,对照组行常规护理,观察组采用常规护理联合综合护理干预,观察两组患者护理后的临床效果和SAS评分情况。结果观察组的临床效果明显优于对照组,且观察组经过护理后的焦虑自评量表分数(SAS)平均分为(45.16±2.2)、明显优于对照组的SAS平均分为(51.59±1.9),两组比较具有差异性(P<0.05)。结论对甲亢患者进行131I治疗并辅以综合护理干预,能够有效缓解患者的焦虑情绪,提高患者的临床治疗效果。
作者 张琴
出处 《健康必读》 2015年7期
关键词 甲亢 护理干预 碘Effectobservationofnursinginterventionin131IodinetreatmentofpatientswithhyperthyroidismZhang.Qin(DepartmentofNuclearMedicine,AffiliatedHospitalofLuzhouMedicalCollege,Luzhou646000,China)AbstractObjectiveToexplorertheeffectofnursinginterventionin131Iodinetreatmentofpatientswithhyperthyroidism.Methods100patientswithhyperthyroidism, whowerefromourhospitalfromFeb2014toDec2014,wererandomlyselectedanddividedintotwogroups__________,includingthecontrolgroupandtheobservationgroup,with50caseseachgroup.Allpatientsweretreatedby131Iodinetherapy,andthecontrolgroupwasgiventheroutinenursing,whilethepatientintheobservationgroupwasgiventhecomprehensivenursingintervention.Afterthat,theclinicaleffectandthescoreofSASwerecompared.ResultsAfterthenursingintervention,Theclinicaleffectintheobservationgroupwasbetterthanthecontrolgroup,andthescoreofSASwas45.16± 2.2,whichwaslowerthanthatofthecontrolgroup.Therewasasignificantdifferencebetweentwogroups(P<0.05).ConclusionThecomprehensivenursingforhype
出版日期 2015年07月17日(中国期刊网平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
  • 相关文献

来源期刊

健康必读

相关关键词

甲亢 护理干预 碘Effectobservationofnursinginterventionin131IodinetreatmentofpatientswithhyperthyroidismZhang.Qin(DepartmentofNuclearMedicine,AffiliatedHospitalofLuzhouMedicalCollege,Luzhou646000,China)AbstractObjectiveToexplorertheeffectofnursinginterventionin131Iodinetreatmentofpatientswithhyperthyroidism.Methods100patientswithhyperthyroidism, whowerefromourhospitalfromFeb2014toDec2014,wererandomlyselectedanddividedintotwogroups__________,includingthecontrolgroupandtheobservationgroup,with50caseseachgroup.Allpatientsweretreatedby131Iodinetherapy,andthecontrolgroupwasgiventheroutinenursing,whilethepatientintheobservationgroupwasgiventhecomprehensivenursingintervention.Afterthat,theclinicaleffectandthescoreofSASwerecompared.ResultsAfterthenursingintervention,Theclinicaleffectintheobservationgroupwasbetterthanthecontrolgroup,andthescoreofSASwas45.16± 2.2,whichwaslowerthanthatofthecontrolgroup.Therewasasignificantdifferencebetweentwogroups(P<0.05).ConclusionThecomprehensivenursingforhype