摘要
【摘 要】目的：本次实验将分析尿沉渣和尿常规在尿液检验中的实际应用价值。方法：本次实验选取了 2018 年 1 月 -2018 年 12 月在本妇幼保健院门诊、住院治疗的患者为对象，其主要科室涉及到儿科，妇科，产科并实施尿液样本的检查，在样本选取上每种检查方式各 90 例。具體而言可分为两种检查形式，一种形式为尿沉渣检查 + 尿常规检查，另一种则为尿常规单一检查，对比两组检查措施的红细胞、白细胞和尿蛋白的检出结果，分析其准确性。结果：从检查结果中看，两组检查方式在红细胞、白细胞和尿蛋白的阳性、阴性检出率上以尿沉渣组的检出率更为准确，即观察组的各项指标检出率分别为 53.3%/42.2% 和 67.8% ，对照组则为 38.8% 、 32.2% 和 52.2% ，其差异具有统计学意义。结论：采用尿沉渣的检查方式能够更好地提升尿液检查项目的准确性，具有高的诊断准确率，可以更好地应用在检查项目中。
【关键词】尿沉渣 ; 尿常规 ; 尿液检验
[Abstract] Objective: this experiment will analyze the practical value of urine sediment and urine routine in urine test. Methods: from January 2018 to December 2018, we selected the outpatients and inpatients in our maternal and child health care hospital. The main departments involved in pediatrics, gynecology, obstetrics and the implementation of urine sample inspection. Each inspection method was 90 cases. Specifically, it can be divided into two inspection forms, one is urine sediment inspection + routine urine inspection, and the other is single routine urine inspection. Compare the detection results of red blood cells, white blood cells and urine protein of the two inspection measures, and analyze their accuracy. Results: from the results of the examination, the positive and negative rates of RBC, WBC and urinary protein in the two groups were more accurate in the urinary sediment group, i.e. the detection rates of various indicators in the observation group were 53.3% / 42.2% and 67.8%, respectively, while those in the control group were 38.8%, 32.2% and 52.2%, with statistical significance. Conclusion: the method of urine sediment examination can improve the accuracy of urine examination, has high diagnostic accuracy, and can be better used in examination.
出版日期
2020年04月27日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）
