凝血检验标本采集与处理过程中的质量控制探讨

在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
摘要 铁力市双丰林业局职工医院 152500   【摘 要】 目的:观察分析凝血检验标本采集与处理过程中的质量控制。方法:选取本院 2016年 11月至 2018年 1月搜集的 117例健康體检者, 117例入组对象应用不同凝血检验标本采集方式。采用统计学分析不同凝血检验标本采集量( 2mL、 1.8mL、 1.6mL)对凝血功能的结果影响以及不同凝血标本存放温度对凝血检验结果的影响(与立即进行送检的对照组加以对比)。结果:不同凝血检验标本采集量的凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间、纤维蛋白原等凝血功能指标比较无差异( P>0.05),不同凝血标本存放温度的凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间、纤维蛋白原等凝血功能指标与立即送检的对照组比较有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:加强凝血检验标本采集与处理过程中的质量控制能够显著提高凝血检验准确性。     【关键词】     凝血检验标本采集 ;处理过程 ;质量控制   [Abstract] Objective: To observe and analyze the quality control in the collection and processing of blood coagulation test specimens. Methods: from November 2016 to January 2018, 117 healthy persons were selected and 117 subjects were enrolled in the study. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the influence of different blood clotting test sample collection volume (2ml, 1.8ml, 1.6ml) on the result of blood clotting function and the influence of different blood clotting sample storage temperature on the result of blood clotting test (compared with the control group which was sent for test immediately). Results: there was no significant difference in prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and other coagulation function indexes among different blood clotting test samples (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and other coagulation function indexes between different blood clotting test samples and the control group (P < 0.05) ) Conclusion: strengthening the quality control in the collection and processing of blood coagulation test specimens can significantly improve the accuracy of blood coagulation test.
机构地区 不详
出处 《世界复合医学》 2020年1期
关键词
出版日期 2020年04月27日(中国期刊网平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)