阴式子宫切除手术治疗子宫脱垂患者的临床效果分析

在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
摘要   【摘 要】目的:研究阴式子宫切除手术应用于子宫脱垂临床治疗中发挥的作用。方法:选择 2017年 8月至 2019年 8月本院接受阴式子宫切除手术 +阴道前后壁修补术治疗的 60例子宫脱垂患者,设为观察组,另选择同期在本院接受传统阴道前后壁修补术治疗的 60例子宫脱垂患者,归为对照组,对比两组患者临床疗效。结果:观察组患者经治疗取得痊愈、显效和无效效果的依次有 42例、 18例和 0例,最终治疗有效率为 100%;对照组经治疗获得痊愈效果和显效效果的分别有 23例和 27例,其余 10例治疗无效,对照组最终治疗有效率为 83.3%,观察组治疗有效率显著高于对照组( P<0.05)。观察组手术时间为( 42.5±6.8)分钟,明显长于对照组的( 34.5±4.6)分钟( P<0.05);两组患者术中出血量比较不具备统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论:针对子宫脱垂患者,选择阴式子宫切除手术 +阴道前后壁修补术进行联合治疗,能够大大提高临床治疗效果,疗效显著。    【关键词】阴式子宫切除术;阴道前后壁修补术;子宫脱垂患者;效果    [Abstract] Objective: To study the role of vaginal hysterectomy in the clinical treatment of uterine prolapse. Methods: from August 2017 to August 2019, 60 cases of uterine prolapse treated by vaginal hysterectomy + repair of anterior and posterior walls of vagina were selected as the observation group, and 60 cases of uterine prolapse treated by traditional repair of anterior and posterior walls of vagina in the same period were selected as the control group to compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results: 42 cases, 18 cases and 0 cases in the observation group were cured, effective and ineffective, and the final effective rate was 100%; 23 cases and 27 cases in the control group were cured and effective, and the remaining 10 cases were ineffective, and the final effective rate in the control group was 83.3%. The effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The operation time of the observation group was (42.5 ± 6.8) minutes, which was significantly longer than that of the control group (34.5 ± 4.6) minutes (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: for the patients with uterine prolapse, the combination of vaginal hysterectomy and repair of the anterior and posterior walls of the vagina can greatly improve the clinical treatment effect, and the curative effect is significant.
出处 《中华医学信息导报》 2020年08期
关键词
出版日期 2020年08月11日(中国期刊网平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)