摘要
【摘要】 目的 研究分析稳定型心绞痛（ SA）与不稳定型心绞痛（ UA）药物治疗的差异及临床意义。方法 此次研究的对象是选择 2017年 1月～ 2019年 10月期间 180例进行心绞痛治疗的患者，将其临床资料进行回顾性分析，并根据表现类型不同分为稳定组和不稳定组， 各 90例。两组患者均采用美托洛尔治疗。比较两组患者心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率。结果 稳定组心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率分别为 71.11%、 67.78%和 73.33%， 不稳定组分别为 87.78%、 85.56%和 90.00%。不稳定组心绞痛、心电图和中医证候总有效率均高于稳定组， 差异具有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论 美托洛尔胶囊更适合于 UA， 可以有效降血脂， 改善心电图， 缓解心绞痛症状， 提高中医证候积分， 值得在 UA中推广使用。
【关键词】 稳定型心绞痛；不稳定型心绞痛；药物治疗；临床意义
[Abstract] Objective To study and analyze the difference and clinical significance of drug treatment between stable angina (SA) and unstable angina (UA). Methods 180 patients with angina pectoris from January 2017 to October 2019 were selected in this study, and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. According to different manifestations, they were divided into stable group and unstable group, 90 cases each. Both groups were treated with metoprolol. The total effective rate of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes were compared between the two groups. Results the total effective rates of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes were 71.11%, 67.78% and 73.33% in stable group, 87.78%, 85.56% and 90.00% in unstable group, respectively. The total effective rates of angina pectoris, ECG and TCM syndromes in the unstable group were higher than those in the stable group (P < 0.05). Conclusion metoprolol capsule is more suitable for UA. It can effectively reduce blood lipid, improve ECG, relieve angina symptoms, and improve TCM syndrome score. It is worth popularizing in UA.
出版日期
2020年09月21日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）
