简介：　　 [摘要 ] 目的 对比分析子宫动脉栓塞与子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。方法 此次研究的对象是选取 2018年 11月— 2019年 10月期间该院收治 64例子宫肌瘤患者，将其临床资料进行回顾性分析，并随机分为两组，分别行子宫动脉栓塞及子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗，比较两组临床疗效、术中出血量、手术时间及住院天数。 结果 两组治疗有效率及术中出血量差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05）；观察组手术时间及住院天数明显少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。 结论 子宫动脉栓塞与子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤效果相当，其中子宫动脉栓塞有助于缩短手术时间及住院时间。  　　 [关键词 ] 子宫动脉栓塞；子宫肌瘤剔除术；子宫肌瘤  [Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical effect of uterine artery embolization and myomectomy in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Methods 64 cases of hysteromyoma in our hospital from November 2018 to October 2019 were selected for this study. The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively and randomly divided into two groups. The two groups were treated with uterine artery embolization and hysteromyomectomy respectively, and the clinical efficacy, intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time and hospitalization days were compared. Results there was no significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate of treatment and the amount of bleeding during operation (P > 0.05); the operation time and hospitalization days in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion uterine artery embolization is equivalent to myomectomy in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma, in which uterine artery embolization can shorten the operation time and hospitalization time.

简介：　　【摘 要】目的：探讨子宫前壁切除及修补术治疗凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入应用效果。方法：选取 2018年 3月 -2019年 3月我院 70例凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入患者为研究对象，根据治疗方案不同分为两组，对照组用传统方案，观察组用子宫前壁切除术及修补术，对比两种方案实施情况。结果：观察组所得失血量、输血量、治疗时间、住院时间、医疗费用数值低于对照组所得数值，统计学有意义（ P<0.05）。结论：子宫前壁切除及修补术治疗凶险性前置胎盘并胎盤植入应用效果显著，值得应用。