简介：AbstractPurpose:Treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures often requires open reduction. However, the technique unavoidably causes patients to suffer greater trauma. As such, minimally invasive techniques should be employed to reduce the surgical-related trauma on these patients and maintain a stable reduction of the fractures. Herein, a minimally invasive wire introducer was designed and used for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. The effectiveness of using a wire-guided device to treat irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures was evaluated.Methods:Between 2013 and 2018, patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures who were initially treated by intramedullary nail fixation but had difficult reduction using the traction beds were retrospectively reviewed. Decision for an additional surgery was based on the displacement of the fracture. The patients were then divided into two groups: those in the control group received an open reduction surgery while those in the observation group received a closed reduction surgery using a minimally invasive wire introducer to guide the wire that could assist in fracture reduction. The operation time, blood loss, visual analogue scale scores, angulation, reduction, neck-shaft angle, re-displacement, limb length discrepancy, and union time were then recorded and analyzed to determine the efficiency of the wire introducer technique. Categorical variables were analyzed by using Chi-square test, while continuous variables by independent t-test and the Mann-Whitney test accordingly.Results:There were 92 patients included in this study: 61 in the control group and 31 in the observation group. There were no significant differences in baseline demographic factors between the two groups. All surgeries were successful with no deaths within the perioperative period. The average follow-up time for the patients was 23.8 months. However, the observation group had a significantly shorter operation time, lower visual analogue scale score, less intraoperative bleeding, and shorter fracture healing time. There were no significant differences in the angulation, reduction, neck-shaft angle, and limb length discrepancy between the two groups.Conclusion:The minimally invasive wire guide achieved a similar effect to that of open reduction in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with difficult reduction. Moreover, the minimally invasive wire introducer is a good technology that accurately guides the wire during reduction. Indeed, it is an effective technique and achieves good clinical outcomes in restoration of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

简介：

简介：AbstractBackground:The purpose of this study was to analyze cases of AO31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) and to identify the relationship between the loss of the posteromedial support and implant failure.Methods:Three hundred ninety-four patients who underwent operative treatment for ITF from January 2003 to December 2017 were enrolled. Focusing on posteromedial support, the A2 ITFs were divided into two groups, namely, those with (Group A, n = 153) or without (Group B, n = 241) posteromedial support post-operatively, and the failure rates were compared. Based on the final outcomes (failed or not), we allocated all of the patients into two groups: failed (Group C, n = 66) and normal (Group D, n = 328). We separately analyzed each dataset to identify the factors that exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups. In addition, a logistic regression was conducted to identify whether the loss of posteromedial support of A2 ITFs was an independent risk factor for fixation failure. The basic factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, side of affected limb, fixation method (intramedullary or extramedullary), time from injury to operation, blood loss, operative time and length of stay.Results:The failure rate of group B (58, 24.07%) was significantly higher than that of group A (8, 5.23%) (χ2 = 23.814, P < 0.001). Regarding Groups C and D, the comparisons of the fixation method (P = 0.005), operative time (P = 0.001), blood loss (P = 0.002) and length of stay (P= 0.033) showed that the differences were significant. The logistic regression revealed that the loss of posteromedial support was an independent risk factor for implant failure (OR = 5.986, 95% CI: 2.667–13.432) (P < 0.001).Conclusions:For AO31-A2 ITFs, the loss of posteromedial support was an independent risk factor for fixation failure. Therefore, posteromedial wall reconstruction might be necessary for the effective treatment of A2 fractures that lose posteromedial support.

简介：AbstractIntertrochanteric fractures have become a severe public health problem in elderly patients. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is a commonly used intramedullary fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Pelvic perforation by cephalic screw is a rare complication. We reported an 84-year-old female who fell at home and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture. The patient underwent surgery with PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device. Routine postoperative examination revealed medial migration of the helical blade that eventually caused pelvic perforation. We performed a cemented total hip arthroplasty as the savage procedure. At the latest follow-up of 12 months after total hip arthroplasty, the patient had no pain or loosening of the prosthesis in the left hip. Pelvic perforation should be considered when choosing PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device, especially in patients with severe osteoporosis wherein the helical blade can be easily inserted during the operation. The lack of devices to avoid oversliding of the helical blade in PFNA is an unreported cause of this complication and should be considered in such cases.