心理护理干预对维持性尿毒症血液透析患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响观察

在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
摘要    【摘要】 目的:探究心理护理干预对维持性尿毒症血液透析患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响。方法:选取 2018年 5月 -2019年 11月接受维持性尿毒症血液透析患者 80例作为研究对象,将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组 40例。对照组采取常规护理方式,观察组在常规护理的基础上实施心理护理干预。对比两组治疗前后焦虑、抑郁情绪差异,同时比较两组并发症发生率。结果:护理前两组 SCL-90评分比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05),护理后观察组评分均低于护理前及对照组,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。护理前两组 SAS和 SDS评分比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05) ;护理后观察组 SAS和 SDS评分均低于干预前及对照组,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:心理护理干预可以缓解维持性尿毒症血液透析患者焦虑抑郁情绪,减少不良反应的发生率,有比较好的治疗效果。     【关键词】 心理护理干预 维持性尿毒症血液透析患者 焦虑抑郁情绪    [Abstract] Objective: To explore the effect of psychological nursing intervention on anxiety and depression of hemodialysis patients with maintenance uremia. Methods: from May 2018 to November 2019, 80 hemodialysis patients with maintenance uremia were selected as the study object, and the patients were divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given psychological nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The differences of anxiety and depression between the two groups before and after treatment were compared, and the incidence of complications between the two groups was compared. Results: there was no significant difference in SCL-90 score between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05). The score of the observation group after nursing was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05); after nursing, the scores of SAS and SDS in the observation group were lower than those before nursing and in the control group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention can alleviate the anxiety and depression of hemodialysis patients with maintenance uremia, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and have a better therapeutic effect.
出处 《世界复合医学》 2020年7期
关键词
出版日期 2020年08月19日(中国期刊网平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)