简介:本文借用加拿大安大略省的案例描述一种特定的专业评估方法是如何窒息学术多样性和创新的.这个案例将阐释我们已经注意到的存在于当今北美大学里的几种因素--对有限资助的担忧、随之而来的对问责制和质量的关注以及自然科学的主导作用--是如何汇聚于一个专业评估模式的框架之内,既限制了学术发展,也妨碍了对学生和社会的服务.作者强调,无论如何,学科之间的差异是任何评估体系也改变不了的现实;一个不合理的评估体系会把某些学科置于只适合于其他学科的框架之内,从而阻碍了它们的发展.最终使大学里性质各异的部分结合在一起的是它们之间相互的独立性和共同的对真理的执著追求.一个分权化的评估过程承认多中心专家的自主性,并且会大大加强上述这两点.
简介:can be applied to improve students’ language competence. It is a good way for the students to acquire the knowledge of language. 5.3 Dictation was regarded as a means of measuring students’ listening comprehension ,working memory and permanent memory are applied and influence each other in dictation in the foreign language learning. However,1977. P243[10] 同[5]P249[11] 同[5]P53[12] 舒白梅. Modern Foreign language Teaching Methodology[M]. China
简介:the students are asked to copy the passage as a dictation,many teachers use dictation practice as an additional exercise. Dictation is largely confined to its use as a testing rather than a teaching device. The controversy whether dictation is a useful practice is existed recently. Therefore this paper is inclined to investigate that systematic dictation practice has a great deal of effect on students’ language skills,dictation has its own theory of the psycholinguistics. The language information processing system